22. CRIMINALS at work, meaningless to save

http://cj.my/post/89077/mind-your-money-seminar-a-success-in-kk/

All the CRIMINALS in Governments - Federal & State had been stealing all public funds
even meant for pensions of the hard working people.  These criminals would grab anything in their paths...

The classic example the CRIMINALS in Government had been stealing Paul to pay John like the EPF once cash rich is now EMPTY POOR FUND after decades of massive cheating.  While EPF only got less than 5% in dividends for some years, other GLC funds were getting  much more in dividend hence divide and rule.

Even EPF at 8% for some years were not enough when the banks were paying more than that.

This is just one EPF robbed dry and there are many other robberies going on especially the day light robberies of Petronas in so many ways.

MASSIVE robberies by the Ali Baba and more than 40 thieves are still going on..towards bankruptcy in Malaysia.

Saving for the old age is meaningless when prices of basic items had risen to so much more and drinks in the coffee shops had increased by many folds... 

Deliberate shortage of essential items has cause prices to rise and unmatched by any savings of the poor folks who live on for decades after retirement at 55, 58, 60 etc.

CRIMINALS IN SBAH and criminals in Pen Msia

>
>
>Subject: The Truth behind the Double Track Project.....
>
>
>
>Bloody Parasites.
>
>
>The Truth behind the Double Track Project......
>
>How they plunder the national coffers
>
>The Truth Behind the Northern Double Track Project &
>Corporate Giants cashing out.
>
>Mahathir Mohamad awarded the Double Tracking Project to MMC-Gamuda on
>21st October 2003, just nine days before he stepped down as Prime
>Minister. On 1st November 2003, Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, fondly known as
>Pak Lah, took over as Prime Minister.
>
>The first thing that Pak Lah did when he took over as Prime Minister
>was to cancel Mahathir’s pet projects. The Crooked Bridge to Singapore
>was one and the Double Tracking Project was the other, which Pak Lah
>shelved the following month in December 2003.
>
>Mahathir was furious. He had spent more
than a year from mid-2002 to
>late 2003 discussing with Pak Lah as to what he can and cannot do once
>he took over as Prime Minister. Whether Pak Lah just forgot or whether
>he did a dirty on Dr Mahathir is not too clear. But the long and short
>of it, Pak Lah did everything he promised he would not do. And
>cancelling Mahathir’s pet projects was clearly one of the do-not-does.
>
>Actually, Pak Lah had a great dislike for Syed Mokhtar Al-Bukhary who
>had shunned him when he was the Deputy Prime Minister. Hence, within
>just a month of taking over as Prime Minister, Pak Lah did the
>unthinkable. He cancelled the Double Tracking Project, the Crooked
>Bridge Project, and all those other projects that Mahathir had given
>to his cronies. Did anyone not bother to tell Pak Lah that one just
>does not slaughter sacred cows, in particular Mahathir’s sacred
cows?
>
>Pak Lah explained that the government’s ‘poor finances’ did not permit
>such grandiose projects -- hence the need to cancel them. This caused
>Mahathir to flip. It gave the impression that Mahathir’s mismanagement
>has bled the country’s finances dry -- hence there is no more money.
>It also gave the impression that Mahathir’s projects are a total waste
>of money -- hence the need to cancel them. In short, Mahathir is a
>bungling idiot.
>
>Try as he may, Syed Mokhtar could not get Pak Lah to agree to revive
>the Double Tracking Project. By 2006, Syed Mokhtar became very
>desperate. To get the project, he had already paid out commissions and
>under-table-money to various parties during Mahathir’s time. Syed
>Mokhtar realised that the only way to get this project back on track
>would be to work through the back door.
>
>Syed Mokhtar asked the CEO of Gamuda, Lin Yun Ling, to approach Seow
>Lun Hoo to mastermind the
penetration of Pak Lah’s inner circle. That
>was how Seow first involved Khairy Jamaludin, Pak Lah’s son-in-law,
>and later Shah Hakim, the close associate of Kamaluddin, Pak Lah’s
>son.
>
>And by a wave of the magical wand of Shah Hakim and Kamaluddin Badawi,
>the project began to be revived.
>
>All these facts have now been revealed in court when Seow and Shah
>Hakim admitted that they “provided technical expertise and networking
>capabilities to help revive the once-shelved RM12.4 billion
>double-tracking railway project….It was through our efforts that the
>project was revived.”
>
>The ‘networking capabilities’ and revival efforts included opening
>doors for Lin to present the revival ideas to then Minister-in-Charge
>of the Economic Planning Unit (EPU), Effendi Norwawi.
>
>Effendi initially told Lin that given Pak Lah’s grim
description of
>the country’s finances it would be difficult for the government to be
>seen as reviving it from government funding. Effendi, the Sarawak
>financial wizard, then created this fanciful term for Lin to use when
>presenting the proposal to the government as a way in getting the
>project revived -- Private Finance Initiatives (PFI).
>
>The idea was: the private sector can include all their additional
>financial costs and risks into the PFI proposal to make the project
>costs higher. Effendi also advised that after approval has been
>obtained, the PFI project could then revert to a design-and-build
>project fully shouldered by the government.
>
>And that was exactly how MMC-Gamuda cheated the Malaysian public into
>believing that the PFI projects were fully funded by the private
>sector whereas in the end the taxpayers would be footing the bill.
>
>For his wonderful advice and
support, Effendi also asked Lin to
>sponsor his new wife’s hobby in extravagant stage productions. That
>explained how Effendi’s wife, Tiara Jacqueline, could have the
>finances to mount the most glamorous and expensive Malay stage play to
>date -- Puteri Gunung Ledang. Lin and Syed Mokhtar were also made to
>sponsor Pak Lah’s wife’s pet project in the Pride Foundation and Endon
>Award for Performing Arts Excellence scholarship fund.
>
>You see, Pak Lah, his family, and his friends in the cabinet, wanted
>to teach Syed Mokhtar and his sidekick, Lin, a good lesson for
>shunning them during Mahathir’s time. So they were going to make
>MMC-Gamuda pay for every single one of their whimsical pleasures.
>
>In truth, what Pak Lah did was not new. The same thing had been done
>during Mahathir’s time by appeasing Siti Hasmah. And now, all the
>corporate giants in the country are outdoing each other
to
appease
>Najib’s wife, Rosmah Mansor. The mainstream media will give prominence
>to the generous donations by these corporate giants to Rosmah’s pet
>project, Permata. What is unseen is that they also donate more
>generously to Rosmah’s fetish for Hermes Birkin handbags and
>jewellery.
>
>The story would be incomplete without explaining that the Chairman of
>the Cabinet Committee on Infrastructure at that time was,
>coincidentally, Najib himself. Najib endorsed the revival of the
>project because Syed Mokhtar had agreed for Najib’s brothers to also
>take huge cuts in various parts of this revived project.
>
>Nazim Razak (Jim) was the architect who will design the various
>railway stations, Nazir Razak (Jay) of CIMB will be the merchant
>banker for the PFI, Nizam Razak will be providing financial and share
>advisory, while Najib’s job is to approve its revival.
>
>That is why the Plaintiff’s company is called NR Sistem, which are the
>initials of the Razak band of brothers.
>
>So why the quarrel now if everyone in Umno and the Umno cronies were
>going to benefit?
>
>Shah Hakim had a deep distrust for Syed Mokhtar. So he had convinced
>Effendi that the project should be divided into two parts – the
>Infrastructure Works to be awarded directly to MGJV for RM10 billion
>and the Systems Work for RM2.38 billion which will be given to a
>contractor of the government’s choice. The Systems Work was supposed
>to be sub-contracted by MGJV to NR Sistem.
>
>When Syed Mokhtar realised that the 30% margin that the Shah Hakim
>group was going to make from the RM2.38 billion System Work contract
>amounted to RM600 million, Syed Mokhtar got upset. He complained to
>Mahathir about how Pak Lah had cancelled the project and forced him to
>use the
services of Shah Hakim who will now make RM600 million ‘atas
>angin’. Mahathir advised Syed Mokhtar to stall signing any contract
>with NR Sistem for the Systems Work.
>
>At that time, Najib decided to play the neutral game in the open
>confrontation between Dr Mahathir and Pak Lah. As far as Najib was
>concerned, he had already secured all the contracts for his brothers.
>
>Mahathir was still very powerful and his attacks could damage Najib’s
>political career. On the other hand, if Mahathir’s vicious attacks
>against Pak Lah succeeded, Najib could unseat Pak Lah as the PM
>without having to challenge him as Umno President.
>
>That was why, in 2007, Mahathir mounted vicious attacks against Pak
>Lah and mocked him about being Mr Clean. Meantime, Syed Mokhtar
>directed Lin to force Seow and Shah Hakim to accept a reduced profit
>margin RM360
million instead of RM600 million.
>
>This infuriated Shah Hakim and Kamaluddin because they thought they
>had already agreed to the 30% margin, which was equivalent to RM600
>million. That money was needed not just for them personally but also
>to fund Pak Lah’s 2008 elections campaign. Syed Mokhtar held back the
>money and refused to give Pak Lah what he needed for the 12th general
>election campaign. Mahathir had advised Syed Mokhtar to hang on and
>not to commit to any figure as Mahathir wanted Pak Lah to perform
>badly in the election and subsequently be ousted. The only way someone
>can become Prime Minister in this country is by paying huge sums of
>money to supporters to vote them into the hot seat. Without funds, Pak
>Lah could not pay for votes and was ousted.
>
>Without enough funds, Mahathir’s plan became a reality. BN and Umno
>fared poorly in the March 2008
GE -- which was regarded as Pak Lah
>losing not just the elections but also losing face as well when
>Bumiputera businessmen who had benefitted from Umno’s patronage dare
>renege on their promise of providing funding.
>
>This was worrisome to the Umno inner circle. The March 2008 GE was
>regarded as Pak Lah’s personal defeat and Mahathir unleashed the Umno
>warlords to cry for Pak Lah’s blood.
>
>Post-March 2008, it was imminent that Pak Lah would have to give way
>to Najib. Syed Mokhtar, being the shrewd businessman that he is, then
>directed Lin not to sign anything with Shah Hakim’s NR Sistem – even
>for the agreed price of RM360 million -- as Pak Lah could no longer
>pose any threat to the project. Syed Mokhtar’s mentor, Mahathir, also
>wanted to ridicule Pak Lah’s son, Kamaludidn, and his son-in-law,
>Khairy Jamaludin (that they are nothing without Abdullah Badawi in
>power). Syed
Mokhtar also wanted Kamaludin and Shah Hakim to beg him
>for the RM360 million that Lin had promised them.
>
>Syed Mokhtar never intended to pay Kamaluddin and Shah Hakim the RM600
>million nor the 33% or RM3.3 billion from the RM10 billion
>Infrastructure Works. All in all, Syed Mokhtar earned RM3.7 billion
>from the combined value of RM12.4 billion for the Double Tracking Rail
>Project.
>
>That is why Scomi has been sidelined from most government businesses
>and projects. Kamaluddin Badawi and Shah Hakim were then forced to sue
>MMC – Gamuda and expose in court that this is how BN/Umno raise funds
>for the elections.
>
>This explains Najib’s Economic Transformation Plan where the
>government will again undertake gargantuan projects on the pretext of
>injecting a revival of the economy. In truth, it is just further acts
>of plundering the nation.
>
>Just imagine how much money Syed Mokhtar will make from
the KL MRT
>Project, which is valued at RM50 billion. Umno cronies expect a margin
>of 30%. That would be a cool RM15 billion! Now, add that to the recent
>KIDEX project awarded to companies owned by Umno Lawyer, Hafarizam
>Harun, and former Chief Justice, Zaki Azmi. Consider also the sale of
>the 26 kilometre Kuala Lumpur-Putrajaya Highway, better known as the
>Maju Expressway (MEX), to EP Manufacturing Berhad for RM 1.7 billion
>-- where the original construction cost of RM976.6 million was by way
>of a government grant, i.e. taxpayers’ money. Include the NFC scandal
>and the 1Malaysia Development Berhad’s suspicious purchase of tycoon
>Ananda Krishan’s power business at RM8 billion. All this is proof that
>UMNO is desperately raising funds for the election as well as
>plundering the nation in a big way one last time. All the UMNO top
>guns are filling up their pockets as they realise that BN is doomed.
>
>This is how Umno operates. It is Umno culture. They will milk the
>country until the country is dry.
>
>Malaysia will soon become the next Greece if we do not kick out UMNO.
>So, whichever prime minister you have, it will still be the same until
>you get rid of UMNO. But what is also untold is that all these will
>have to be paid by hiking the project costs many-folds and it is the
>country and the public that will pay for such highly inflated costs.
>
>This is how Umno does business and
controls the award of Government
>tenders. Projects are awarded, then shelved, then revived at a much
>higher cost, then given a new name or rebranded, and then passed back
>to the government to shoulder. It also reveals the huge profit margins
>that are made to line the pockets of the Umno cronies using the tax
>payer’s money and our EPF contributions.
>
>How long more are Malaysians going to tolerate these dirty parasites?

20. DE missing on musa aman the CRIMINAL?

http://www.theborneopost.com/2013/07/24/sabah-cm-denies-claims-linking-him-to-task-force-project-ic-via-proxy/

Sabah CM denies claims linking him to Task Force Project IC via proxy

by Murib Morpi. Posted on July 24, 2013, Wednesday

Read more: http://www.theborneopost.com/2013/07/24/sabah-cm-denies-claims-linking-him-to-task-force-project-ic-via-proxy/#ixzz2a0KHccHU

KOTA KINABALU: The Royal Commission of Inquiry on illegal immigrants in Sabah yesterday heard a deposition that Chief Minister Datuk Seri Musa Aman has denied all allegations linking him to Project IC made by a witness in its proceeding last week.
Former State Attorney General, Datuk Anthony Roderick Fernandez, appeared before the commission and informed the five-men panel that he was representing Musa to file an application for notes of proceeding pertaining to the allegation.
“A witness, Dr Chong Eng Leong, has made some serious allegations against the Chief Minister. I would like for it to be noted that my client denies every allegation on his involvement in Project IC,” he said.
Fernandez also told the Commission that Musa will decide on his next course of action after reading the extract and may elect to appear before the panel to give his own testimony.
Dr Chong, a former senator and state assemblyman, testified last week that Musa had led a Sabah Umno task force to find foreigners to be registered as party members to vote for Barisan Nasional. He claimed to have received this information from one Jabar Khan, who was the secretary of the said task force formed in 1991.
Commission chairman Tan Sri Steve Shim, granted Fernandez’s application, saying the extract on the notes of proceeding will be given to be examined by the Chief Minister.
Meanwhile, conducting officer, Manoj Kurup, informed the panel that Dr Chong has made a request following his testimony last week to have a bundle of supporting documents submitted as evidence and examined by the Commission.
“We have looked through the bundles and decided that two of them, which contain a collection of newspaper cuttings and exhibits from the Likas election petition, were relevant and shall be marked as exhibits for this Inquiry,” said Manoj.
The Commission resumed its proceedings with three more witnesses called to testify yesterday, bringing the total to 192 so far.
At least six more witnesses are expected to be called in the next two days, including Melalap assemblyman cum Rural Development Minister Datuk Radin Malleh

19. CRIMINAL MUSA AMAN up to?

sure the BIGGEST traitor/robber/land grabber /corrupted/ women grabber/ and you name it what else- in Sabah and gang of conmen.  Joshua

Musa Aman denies any role in 'Project IC'

Malaysiakini – 17 hours ago

SABAH RCI Sabah Chief Minister Musa Aman has informed the royal commission of inquiry (RCI) into illegal immigrants in Sabah that he had no involvement in the so-called Project IC, as claimed by a witness last week.

"Last Thursday, Dr Chong Eng Leong made serious allegations linking my client to Project IC.
"I have been instructed to inform that he (Musa, right ) denies any involvement in the alleged Project IC," the chief minister's lawyer Roderic Fernandez told the RCI sitting in Kota Kinabalu today.
Fernandez, who is a former Sabah attroney-general, said Musa had also instructed him to hold a watching brief and to request for the notes of proceedings pertaining to the allegation by Chong.
Fernandez said Musa would decide his next course of action after he is able to peruse the notes of proceedings.
The application was granted by RCI chairperson Steve Shim, who instructed the RCI secretariat to extract portions pertaining to the allegation for Musa to make a decision on what he wanted to do.
'Musa chaired Umno task force to register foreigners'
Last week, Chong, a former Parti Bersatu Sabah (PBS) politician who authored a book on Project IC, testified that Musa chaired a task force back in 1991 that was designed to register foreigners as Umno members after giving them Malaysian citizenship.
"When Umno first entered Sabah, this task force was formed, and the chief was none other but Musa Aman himself," Chong had told the RCI.
Speaking to reporters later, DAP assemblyperson for Likas Junz Wong, who was in the public gallery, said it would be in the people's interest for Musa to testify before the RCI to clear his name.
"The RCI should decide (whether to call Musa as a witness or not but) he has a social and political responsibility to come clean," Wong said outside the Kota Kinabalu High Court complex, where the RCI is sitting.
Meanwhile, in his testimony today, 192nd witness Ismail Mohd Yakub from the Tawau Municipal Council said that 40 percent of Tawau residents are non-citizens.
Basing this on the council's 2010 census, he said the immigrants have good relations with Sabahans, as most of them have adopted the local lifestyle.
"That's why it's not a big problem that 41 percent of people in Tawau are non-citizens.
"Plus, the local culture is highly tolerant," he said.

18. The CRIMINALS in Government

Thursday, 18 July 2013 18:23

Musa Aman involved in 'Project IC', RCI told 

 

SABAH RCI Current Sabah Chief Minister Musa Aman also allegedly had a hand in ‘Project IC’, the royal commission of inquiry (RCI) was told today.
Dr Chong Eng Leong, a former Parti Bersatu Sabah (PBS) politician who authored a book about Project IC, claimed that Musa chaired a task force back in 1991 which was designed to register foreigners as Umno members after giving them citizenship.
When Umno first entered Sabah, this task force was formed, and the chief was none other but Musa Aman himself,” Chong said during proceedings today.
Similar to a claim made by Sabah opposition politician Jeffrey Kitingan yesterday at the RCI, Chong also said that the project IC exercise was done in order to increase the Muslim population in Sabah.
“This has nothing to do with race or religion. This is pure politics,” he said, noting that a sharp increase in the Malay population is Sabah allowed Umno to take foothold of Sabah.
According to Chong, between 1970 and 2000, in a span of 30 years, the Malay population in Sabah saw a sharp growth rate of 1,552 percent.
This is almost 10 times the growth rate of the Kadasan, Dusun, and Murut native communities, and also significantly higher than the 344 percent growth posted by the Bajau community.
Chong said that this growth cannot be attributed to the rural Sabahans registering themselves late due to a previous lack of access to government offices.
“If that was true, why is there no sharp increase in the Kadazan, Dusun and Murut communities?” he asked.
“Why is the Malay population growing the highest?” he said.
He said that Umno had already “achieved its target” in boosting the population, because the state now has 33 Muslim-majority state seats, which is more than the number of Chinese majority and non-Muslim bumiputra majority seats.
- Malaysiakini

Full article: http://www.malaysia-chronicle.com/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=131182:musa-aman-involved-in-project-ic-rci-told&Itemid=2#ixzz2ZOd3c4fk
Follow us: @MsiaChronicle on Twitter

the Criminals in Government make this happen

See how the Criminals in Government act again the local..Joshua

 

Private Sabah colleges cry foul

Published on: Thursday, July 11, 2013   http://www.dailyexpress.com.my/news.cfm?NewsID=86052

Kota Kinabalu: Local private higher learning institutions (IPTS) in Sabah are in a dilemma over issues which are hampering efforts to promote Sabah as a hub of education excellence. This includes the uncontrolled opening of branches by colleges from the peninsula in the State and huge difference between the study fees charged by the local IPTS and public higher learning institutions (IPTAs).
Sabah Private Higher Learning Institution Association President Datuk Wong Khen Thau said although the Government recently stopped the issuance of licences for new IPTS, at the same time there is no policy to control other colleges from setting up branches in the State.
"There are lot of colleges branching out to the State from the peninsula.
This is an issue that we seriously need to look at, as we need to give more chances to the existing local IPTS to grow," he said.
He said the Government should have a proper control on this, like only giving consideration to those universities or colleges in the peninsula to expand or open up branches in Sabah "if they offer courses that we do not have presently in the State".
"Unless the local IPTS have no more capacity to accommodate the students in Sabah then it is justifiable É at the moment we still have the capacity to accommodate," he said, hoping the Government would look at this seriously.
Wong said this when met after he led a delegation from the association in paying a courtesy call on State Resource Development and Information Technology Minister, Datuk Siringan Gubat, at his office in Wisma Bandaraya, Wednesday.
Wong also said the IPTS in Sabah would not be able to help the Government attract foreign students because the present study fee structure imposed by certain IPTAs in Sabah is way too low than what they are able to offer.
This is akin to the IPTAs subsidising the foreign students to come and study in Sabah, he said.
He cited an IPTA in the State which is charging a foreign student as low as RM3,500 per year, which is about three to four times lower than what the IPTS are charging local students.
"Both the IPTAs and IPTS are tasked with promoting Malaysia to the world, but we do not receive very much assistance from the government in this aspect," he said.
"In fact the study fees charged by the IPTS in Sabah are the cheapest in the whole countryÉso we can say that Malaysia through the IPTAs are indirectly subsidising foreign students to come to study in this country.
"Is such a policy fair to the IPTS and local students?
Why can't the government then look at, instead of subsidising the foreign students, helping the local students by subsidising them to study at the IPTS here, which would be more sensible?" he said.
He said in any country in the world their universities would always charge foreign students the most. "But only in Malaysia, that is in Sabah, we charge the foreign students less.
I am talking about the IPTAs, as the IPTS are always charging the foreign students more and only the IPTAs are doing different things," he said.
"I am not saying all the IPTAs are doing the same but that they have autonomy to do what they like.
"So this is one of the great challenges that we are facing.
We have foreign students coming in and telling us why should they go and study at our private higher learning institutions when they can go to the public institutions where the study fees are much, much cheaper.
"We are asked to fight the battle, to recruit more foreign students, but at the same time we are facing this scenario. So we are actually slapping our own face. This is the dilemma most of the IPTS in Sabah are having," he said.
Commenting on the call by State Minister with Special Functions Datuk Teo Chee Kang for renowned foreign varsities to set up campuses in Sabah, Wong said the association has no objection if it means top rated universities which can offer something none of the local universities or colleges have to offer.
"We do not object to this proposal because we already have a number of universities and colleges which support the needs, except maybe for very specialised education courses which we still do not have here, which would be okay if we can introduce it here," he said.
"But the market in Sabah is not that big for such specialised courses like medical doctor and engineering. Although we are in need of doctors, engineers and so on, we do not have that kind of supply of local studentsÉmeaning if we are to offer such specialised courses at this point of time there would not be many takers," he added.
"And it is probably cheaper still to go and study such kind of specialised courses overseas or in the peninsula itself."
"And if you bring in universities which are not even properly rated in their own country it will only defeat the purpose.
"We are talking about Malaysia wanting to become a centre of education excellence, the Government must make sure that the local universities and colleges are able to grow to that level," he said.
"If not the question is where are we? Are we promoting Malaysia as a centre of education excellence while at the same time we do not trust or practise double standards on our local higher learning institutions?"
"So lets look at things carefully. We need to do a lot of studies before bringing in foreign universities.
If we can bring in top rated universities, then it would be more beneficial because it would bring along many foreign students to come into the State for further study," said Wong.
But you are just talking about ordinary universities, then you should give priority to the local universities to grow.
" Malaysia has also been talking about turning education into another source of revenue for the country, through the entry of many foreign students, and we feel that all the private higher learning institutions are able to cater to all the needs in SabahÉand since the IPTS and IPTA in the country are now at the same level in terms of education quality and so on, we hope there is still a lot capacity for all us to support whatever is required in Sabah," he said.
During the meeting with Siringan, Wong also expressed the association's hope to work closely with his Ministry, especially in meeting the Government's needs in terms of manpower training.

16. Work of Criminals in Governemnt

why should taxpayers pay for these abuses by sort of  'Criminals'?  Joshua
http://www.thestar.com.my/News/Nation/2013/07/10/six-win-suit-illegal-arrest-detention.aspx

Published: Wednesday July 10, 2013 MYT 5:39:00 PM
Updated: Wednesday July 10, 2013 MYT 5:48:59 PM

Six win suit against police and govt over illegal arrest and detention

By M.MAGESWARI and LOSHANA K.SHAGAR

KUALA LUMPUR:  Five lawyers and an activist won a civil dispute against the police and Government over their arrest and detention during a walk to mark the World Human Rights Day in December 2007.
High Court judge Justice John Louis O'Hara held that the arrests of R. Sivarasa, N. Surendran, Latheefa Beebi Koya, Eric Paulsen, Amer Hamzah Arshad and activist Johny Andu @ Abu Bakar Adnan and their subsequent detention by the police were unlawful.
"I had the opportunity to view video recording and observed the photographic evidence which provided a pictorial enactment of what had actually transpired during the walk," he said.
Justice O'Hara said that Commanding Officer Superintendent Che Hamzah Che Ismail, who was then Dang Wangi's Acting OCPD, had given conflicting, confusing and contradictory instructions to the plaintiffs, who were among the participants, when he asked them to disperse within 10 minutes.
Justice O'Hara said "it was apparent that Supt Che Hamzah was not decisive" of his disperse order.
He said the order gave the impression that the participants had 10 minutes to disperse, but they were arrested before they could do so.
On Dec 8, 2010, The plaintiffs filed the lawsuit against Supt Che Hamzah, Inspector-General of Police, Home Ministry and the Government over claims for wrongful arrest, wrongful detention and malicious prosecution.
Justice O'Hara ruled that the six were also denied of their right to legal representation.
In ruling in favour of the six plaintiffs, Justice O'Hara said they had named the relevant parties in the claim.
On Dec 10, 2007, the six were charged for taking part in an unlawful assembly and failing to adhere to police orders to disperse, allegedly committed a day before (Dec 9, 2007) in front of a shopping complex in Jalan Tuanku Abdul Rahman.
On April 16, 2009, they were freed by a Sessions Court without entering a defence.
However, Justice O'Hara dismissed the claim on malicious prosecution saying that it was the prerogative of the Attorney-General under the Federal Constitution to exercise his discretionary powers to institute proceedings.
"I did not find it (the prosecution) was initiated in bad faith. He (A-G) is just doing his job," he said in his judgment.
He awarded RM60,000 in damages for all plaintiffs and RM5,454 in special damages for Paulsen for his flight tickets from South Africa to appear for the 15-day trial.
He also ordered the defendants to pay 5% in interest for general and special damages from the date of judgment to its full settlement.
He directed the defendants to pay RM60,000 in costs.
He made the order after hearing evidence from 19 witnesses during the trial.
Speaking to reporters here, lead counsel Edmund Bon said it was a great victory for democracy and human rights, saying that the suit was filed to uphold freedom of assembly and not for money.
Surendran and Johny said it was a historic end and the ruling confirmed the right to assemble peacefully.
Paulsen said that the ruling affirmed that "you cannot abuse power as you like" for persons entrusted with power to carry out duties.
In their lawsuit, they sought for a declaration that their rights under the Federal Constitution were violated.
In their statement of claim, the six claimed they participated in a peaceful rally and marched in conjunction with World Human Rights Day, which is celebrated worldwide on Dec 10 every year.
The defendants were represented by Senior Federal Counsel Nadia Hanim Tajudin and SFC Lailawati Ali.